pwning the ontological argument, rage-comic style

I find "rage comics" quite humorous. these are comics featuring various faces to express emotions, documenting everyday experience. I decided to make one on the ontological argument for the existence of God, since the "troll face" (first pane) seems more than appropriate. I've discussed the ontological argument before, on this post (I specifically critique Anselm of Canterbury's form, but they're all very similar). I think I succinctly summed up the argument in the first pane.

the other faces, in order, are called "challenge accepted", "NO rage face", and "f**k yea"